Ratio of the average wage paid during the reporting period to female employees of the organization for a specified position compared to the average wage paid during the reporting period to male employees of the organization for the same position.
Ratio of the average wage paid during the reporting period to female employees of the organization for a specified position compared to the average wage paid during the reporting period to male employees of the organization for the same position.
Organizations should footnote all assumptions used, including details about the position used in the calculation. See usage guidance for further information.
This metric is intended to estimate gender wage equity at an organization. If women and men are paid the same average wage for the same position, the ratio would be 1.
This ratio can be calculated based on salaried employees with fixed wages or on employees with variable salaries (such as hourly, daily, weekly, other specified time cycle, or other specified parameter).
Organizations should footnote the specific position used in calculating this ratio, including whether the position is a managerial or non-managerial role. Organizations reporting this metric for multiple positions are encouraged to report these various data points for gender wage equity and to specify the position to which each data point corresponds.
While this metric helps organizations begin to understand gender wage equity in their operations, organizations are cautioned that other factors may affect the data collected. For example, the average wages reported for this metric may only be meaningful if multiple individuals of both genders have a similar position within the organization. Employee education, experience, and tenure at the organization, among other factors, may also influence wage disparities.
In specific contexts, and based on evidence, this metric may serve as a proxy indicator of whether the outcome being sought by an investor or organization is occurring (the WHAT dimension of impact). For more on the alignment of IRIS metrics to the five dimensions of impact, see IRIS+ and the Five Dimensions of Impact (https://iris.thegiin.org/document/iris-and-the-five-dimensions/). No single metric is sufficient to understand an impact; rather, metrics are selected as a set across all dimensions of impact. When possible, the selection of metrics to measure and describe the five dimensions should be based on best practice and evidence.
Metrics identified as "cross-category" are those that are relevant to any IRIS+ Impact Category or Impact Theme (i.e., these metrics are not specific to any particular industry/category or theme).
June 2022 - IRIS v5.3 Released (current version)
Immaterial change. Minor revisions to definition and usage guidance for clarity.
January 2020 - IRIS v5.1 Released
No change.
May 2019 - IRIS v5.0 Released
No change.
March 2016 - IRIS v4.0 Released
New metric. Gender Wage Equity (OI1855) was developed via the IRIS Taxonomy Group.