Percentage price savings the client obtains by purchasing a product or service from the organization and the average price that they would otherwise pay for a similar product or service in the local market.
Percentage price savings the client obtains by purchasing a product or service from the organization and the average price that they would otherwise pay for a similar product or service in the local market.
This metric is intended to capture the price discount or savings to a client of purchasing the organization’s products or services rather than a similar product or service. For example, if the organization's product costs USD 5 and the average price for a similar product is USD 10 in the local market, this would be calculated as: (USD 10 – USD 5) / USD 10 = 50% savings. Positive numbers can be interpreted as savings to the consumer (client). In this calculation, organizations should use prices as of the end of the reporting period. In specific contexts, and based on evidence, this metric can serve as a proxy indicator of whether the outcome being sought by an investor or organization is occurring (the WHAT dimension of impact). For more on the alignment of IRIS metrics to the five dimensions of impact, see IRIS+ and the Five Dimensions of Impact (https://iris.thegiin.org/document/iris-and-the-five-dimensions/). No single metric is sufficient to understand an impact; rather, metrics are selected as a set across all dimensions of impact. When possible, the selection of metrics to measure and describe the five dimensions should be based on best practice and evidence.
This metric is intended to capture the price discount/savings as a percentage compared to a similar product/service. For example, if the organization's product costs $5 and the average price for a similar product is $10 in the local market, this would be calculated as: ($10$5)/ $10 = 0.5 or 50% savings. Positive numbers can be interpreted as savings to the consumer (client). Organizations should report these prices as of the end of the reporting period.
This metric is multi-dimensional with regard to the five dimensions of impact. In some contexts, this metric can serve as an indicator of whether the outcome being sought by an investor or organization is occurring (the WHAT dimension of impact). It may also help measure the HOW MUCH Scale dimension, which helps estimate the number of the targeted stakeholders experiencing the outcome. For more on the alignment of IRIS metrics to the five dimensions of impact, see IRIS+ and the Five Dimensions of Impact (https://iris.thegiin.org/document/iris-and-the-five-dimensions/). No single metric is sufficient to understand an impact; rather, metrics are selected as a set across all dimensions of impact. When possible, the selection of metrics to measure and describe the five dimensions should be based on best practice and evidence.
Metrics identified as "cross-category" are those that are relevant to any IRIS+ Impact Category or Impact Theme (i.e., these metrics are not specific to any particular industry/category or theme).
June 2022 - IRIS v5.3 Released (current version)
Immaterial change. Minor revisions to definition and usage guidance for clarity.
May 2021 - IRIS v5.2 Released
Immaterial change. Minor revision to calculation and usage guidance language for clarity.
January 2020 - IRIS v5.1 Released
No change.
May 2019 - IRIS v5.0 Released
Immaterial change. Formula and usage guidance slightly updated to clarify and simplify calculation. No material changes to formula.
March 2016 - IRIS v4.0 Released
Immaterial change. Minor revision to definition language for clarity.
March 2014 - IRIS v3.0 Released
New metric. Client Savings Premium (PI1748) was developed via the IRIS Taxonomy Group.